JavaScript Menu, DHTML Menu Powered By Milonic

Media Center


Join our e-mail mailing
list and receive our
monthly newsletter free
of charge


Embassy in the News

NATO's most critical mission

M. Ashraf Haidari

Pajhwok News


When citizens of NATO allies look at the record of failure of military interventions in Afghanistan over the past century and a half, they may be tempted to ask: What chance of success does NATO have? People should realise, however, that comparing the present-day stabilisation mission to past military adventures is not appropriate.

Past foreign involvement in Afghanistan - including that of the British and Russian Empires in the 19th century and, more recently, the Soviet Union in the late 20th century - were motivated by imperial and ideological competition. Those powers were not striving to build a stable, democratic and self-reliant society. And they certainly signed nothing like the Afghanistan Compact.

Today, more than 40 nations are working together to stabilise Afghanistan and consolidate its new democracy. This truly international endeavor enjoys the overwhelming support of Afghans, who constitute an important strategic asset in the fight to contain terrorism. Thus, it is clear that NATO is in Afghanistan for different reasons altogether, including the national security of its member states.

One cannot deny the real security risk NATO allies will face if Afghanistans stabilisation efforts fail and the country once more becomes safe haven for terrorists, criminals and drug traffickers, as it was under the Taliban.

We know from 9/11 and other terrorist attacks that threats to global security are increasingly transnational in nature. Non-state actors are more dangerous today than state actors were during the Cold War era when security threats primarily emanated from interstate hostilities centered on ideological differences between members of the Warsaw Pact and NATO.

Third World proxy conflicts characterised the Cold War between the two ideological blocs for more than four decades, and Afghanistan remained as one of the main Cold War theaters from 1979 to 1989. However, with the disintegration of the Soviet Union and collapse of Communism at the end of the 80s, NATOs Cold War role ended.

The 9/11 terrorist attacks came as a rude reminder to NATO members that despite the demise of Communism, there were still many threats to the West from radical forces, threats that represented a dark side of the new world order shaped by globalisation. This posed a direct challenge to the transatlantic alliance itself.

It is generally agreed that premature disengagement from countries like Afghanistan and a failure to recognise the rising threat of international terrorism eventually contributed to the 9/11 attacks on the United States.

Securing Afghanistan is now one of NATOs most important post-Cold War tasks - its raison d'tre in a way. A firm commitment by NATO allies to bolstering their troop levels by 7,500 additional soldiers without functional and territorial restrictions, commonly known as caveats, is critical to defeating the resurgent Taliban in the south and east of Afghanistan.

In addition, NATO allies and other states must firmly commit to providing more military and police trainers to build Afghan security forces to reach the targeted goals of 80,000 soldiers for the Afghan National Army (ANA) and 82,000 officers for the Afghan National Police (ANP) by the end of 2009. To meet these training requirements, Afghanistan needs more than 70 operational mentoring and liaison teams (OMLTs), each comprising 16-20 men, to train ANA units and 2,300 police trainers, including force protection, to implement the district police development programme currently underway.

In the meantime, NATO allies must firmly commit to the long-term implementation of the Afghanistan National Development Strategy, which in many ways resembles the Marshall Plan in vision and scope. NATO nations understand that Europe could not have rebuilt on its own in the aftermath of the Second World War, under the increasing threat posed by the former Soviet Union, without external aid. Thanks in large measure to the Marshall Plan, war-ravaged Europe was able to rebuild rapidly, and today it is hard to believe that the previous centurys two devastating world wars were fought primarily on European soil.

The success of the Marshall Plan in Europe in the 20th century is an excellent reminder to the 26-member military alliance in the 21st century that when nations come to each others aid with firm and full commitment, no force - no matter how formidable - can prevent their victory if they stand together until the job is done.

Afghans just celebrated their New Year (1387), which will be a pivotal year in the fight against terrorism. A resolute NATO, armed with requisite security and development resources, will be certain to secure Afghanistan and the entire region. Afghans look forward to finding a strong and determined partner in NATO in the year ahead, a partner who can help finish the job started by the international community seven years ago.

M. Ashraf Haidari is Political Counselor at the Embassy of Afghanistan in Washington, DC

Home | Contact Us | Sitemap © 2006 Embassy of Afghanistan and GlobeScope Inc. All Rights Reserved.